Episode #184 - Is Artificial Intelligence really an existential threat?
Is Artificial Intelligence really an existential risk?
This episode challenges the popular idea that technology is a neutral tool, instead asking whether each technological advance carries its own moral trajectory based on the power it grants and the systems it shapes. Building from last episode's critique of ChatGPT’s limitations, the discussion explores how narrow AI, like large language models, might evolve into general intelligence not by mimicking humans but by developing new, non-human forms of intelligence. Referencing thinkers like John Searle, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Stuart Russell, the episode lays out the major concerns surrounding AGI: the alignment problem, instrumental convergence, and the limits of containment. Through vivid analogies—like AI viewing humans the way humans view bees or bugs—the episode paints a chilling but plausible picture of an intelligence that may surpass human understanding without ever meaning harm. It concludes by reframing the AGI debate as part of a larger question: how should we relate to technology in an era when innovation vastly outpaces regulation? Whether or not AGI is ever realized, the conversation calls for a new level of responsibility, reflection, and global coordination around the release of high-stakes technologies.
Further Reading:
The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values by Brian Christian (2020)
Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control by Stuart Russell (2019)
Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence by Max Tegmark (2017)
See the full transcript of this episode here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #183 - Is ChatGPT really intelligent?
What if consciousness is an illusion?
This episode examines whether machines like ChatGPT are truly intelligent or merely simulate intelligence through statistical pattern recognition. It begins by revisiting the Turing Test and Alan Turing’s proposal that a machine displaying human-like behavior could be considered intelligent. John Searle’s Chinese Room argument challenges this idea by distinguishing between syntax and semantics, arguing that computers manipulate symbols without understanding their meaning. The episode traces how this critique applies to modern large language models, including ChatGPT, and discusses Noam Chomsky’s view that such systems, while useful, do not engage in genuine scientific or moral reasoning. Chomsky argues that human intelligence involves creating explanations and distinguishing between what is possible and impossible, a capacity lacking in current AI. The episode concludes by warning that hype and misunderstanding around AI may distract from urgent global threats, such as climate change and nuclear war, and sets the stage for a continued discussion on AI’s potential impact on society.
Further Reading:
Common Sense, the Turing Test, and the Quest for Real AI by Hector J. Levesque (2017)
Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence edited by John Preston and Mark Bishop (2002)
The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul edited by Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett (1981)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #182 - What if free will is an illusion?
What if free will is an illusion?
This episode explores the question of whether free will is an illusion and why that question matters beyond abstract theory. It begins by connecting the issue to everyday concerns like moral accountability, social responsibility, and the structure of legal and political systems. The conversation outlines the long philosophical debate over free will and determinism, placing views like libertarian free will, hard determinism, and compatibilism on a spectrum of belief. It examines how definitions of freedom have evolved, including the distinction between wanting something and willing it, and highlights Harry Frankfurt’s theory of first and second order desires. The episode also considers how society might change if hard determinism were widely accepted, from criminal justice to incentive structures and personal blame. It closes by noting the growing relevance of artificial intelligence in reshaping how we understand agency, setting up the next episode’s discussion of AI and free will.
Further Reading:
Free Will: A Very Short Introduction by Thomas Pink (2004)
Four Views on Free Will by John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas (2007)
Freedom Evolves by Daniel C. Dennett (2003)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #181 - What if consciousness is an illusion?
What if consciousness is an illusion?
This episode explores the theory of illusionism in consciousness studies. It examines the claim that phenomenal consciousness may not be a separate feature of reality but a byproduct of the brain’s physical processes. The discussion highlights how common metaphors shape our understanding of consciousness, often reinforcing the belief that subjective experience is something distinct and in need of special explanation. Philosophers such as Susan Blackmore and Daniel Dennett argue that this belief might be based on misleading intuitions. They propose that the feeling of a unified self is a simplified representation created by the brain. The episode also considers objections to illusionism, including the concern that calling consciousness an illusion may mischaracterize its role. It concludes by introducing the topic of free will, which will be explored in the next episode.
Further Reading:
Consciousness Explained by Daniel C. Dennett (1991)
Consciousness: An Introduction by Susan Blackmore (2003)
Illusionism: As a Theory of Consciousness edited by Keith Frankish (2017)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #180 - What if everything is consciousness?
What if everything is consciousness?
This episode introduces the theory of panpsychism as a response to the “hard problem” of consciousness. Drawing from philosopher Philip Goff’s book Galileo’s Error, the discussion explores how modern science, may be inherently unequipped to fully explain consciousness. Panpsychism offers an alternative framework, suggesting that consciousness is a fundamental feature of all matter, existing even at the smallest scales. The episode traces the implications of this view—from reshaping environmental ethics and our concept of self, to the potential for new scientific approaches and reevaluations of artificial intelligence. Through interviews and thought experiments, the episode considers how adopting panpsychism could shift both our personal worldviews and broader societal values.
Further Reading:
Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness – Philip Goff (2019)
Panpsychism: The Philosophy of the Sensuous Cosmos – Peter Ells (2011)
Panpsychism in the West – David Skrbina (Revised Edition, 2017)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #179 - Why is consciousness something worth talking about?
Why is consciousness something worth talking about?
This episode marks a shift from exploring the history of philosophy to applying those ideas to real-world issues, focusing on the urgent and complex topic of consciousness. The discussion introduces the “hard problem” of consciousness—the mystery of how subjective experience arises from physical brain processes—and explores why this question, though theoretical, has massive implications for ethics, politics, science, and society. Drawing from thought experiments like philosophical zombies, animal minds, and artificial intelligence, the episode investigates how assumptions about consciousness shape everything from moral responsibility to public policy. It emphasizes that even if consciousness can’t be fully explained, we still make daily choices based on our beliefs about it—choices that affect how we treat animals, machines, the elderly, and even each other. By unpacking current debates in neuroscience and philosophy, the episode invites listeners to think critically about how we define consciousness and how those definitions quietly structure our world.
Further Reading:
Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness by Philip Goff (2019)
Consciousness: Creeping Up on the Hard Problem by Jeffrey Gray (2007)
Philosophers on Consciousness: Talking about the Mind edited by Jack Symes (2022)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #178 - Susan Sontag - How much is your view of everything affected by metaphors?
Susan Sontag - How much is your view of everything affected by metaphors?
This episode explores Susan Sontag’s critical view on how metaphors shape public understanding of illness, often with unintended harm. Building on her work Illness as Metaphor, the episode examines how common comparisons—like describing cancer as a “battle” or the mind as a “machine”—simplify complex realities and reinforce social stigmas. From historical myths surrounding tuberculosis to modern narratives about cancer, AIDS, and COVID, Sontag reveals how cultural metaphors influence not only how diseases are perceived, but how patients are treated by society and medicine. Through real-world examples and cultural critique, the episode challenges listeners to examine the metaphors they use, encouraging greater awareness of how language can impact lives—especially in moments of vulnerability.
Further Reading:
Illness as Metaphor by Susan Sontag (1978)
Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors by Susan Sontag (1989)
Metaphor in Illness Writing: Fight and Battle Reused by Anita Wohlmann (2022)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #177 - Susan Sontag - Do you speak the language of pictures and videos?
Susan Sontag - Do you speak the language of pictures and videos?
This episode opens with Susan Sontag’s early encounter with Holocaust photographs—an experience she described as a turning point in her life. From there, it explores her argument that modern people have a complicated and often uncritical relationship with images. Sontag urges us to recognize how photographs and videos can both reveal and distort reality, shaping emotion, memory, and even moral response. She challenges the idea that simply seeing images is equivalent to understanding or action, warning instead of a culture trapped in passive consumption and nostalgia.
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial by David Lipsky (2023)
The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells (2019)
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #176 - Susan Sontag - Do you criticize yourself the way you criticize a movie?
Susan Sontag - Do you criticize yourself the way you criticize a movie?
In this episode, we explore how Susan Sontag—a fierce cultural critic inspired by Simone Weil—challenged the modern obsession with interpretation, both in psychoanalysis and in art. Sontag admired Weil’s uncompromising stance against the status quo and echoed that same resistance by criticizing how analysis can distance us from the immediacy of lived experience. She warned that filtering emotions and art through normative theories often alienates people from their own reality, granting undue power to experts while reducing complex experiences to predictable patterns. Instead, Sontag called for an "erotics of art"—a renewed way of engaging with form and style that invites visceral, transformative encounters rather than detached interpretation. Through this lens, she argued, we open ourselves to art—and life—in ways that allow discomfort, openness, and even confusion to shape us. The episode closes by linking this sensibility to Sontag’s belief that truth demands sacrifice, and that progress requires voices from the margins, not just those who play by the rules of reason.
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial
David Lipsky, 2023This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
Naomi Klein, 2014The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming
David Wallace-Wells, 2019
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #175 - Simone Weil - Vessels of God
Simone Weil - Vessels of God
This episode explores Simone Weil’s view on self-transformation, contrasting the Western emphasis on willpower and discipline with her deeper focus on cultivating attention. While will is effective for physical action and routine habit-building, Weil argues it falls short when it comes to moral clarity, inspiration, and spiritual depth. Attention, for Weil, is not passive but a disciplined openness to truth, beauty, and obligation—qualities she sees as reflections of a higher moral order, which she calls God. Crucially, Weil believes that goodness only becomes real when individuals act as vessels for this universal good, through conscious participation in the world. The episode also outlines three pathways to developing attention—love of beauty, love of neighbor, and religious or transcendent experience—and emphasizes the need for humility and lucid thought as safeguards against ego-driven moral blindness, especially in times of collective conflict.
Further Reading:
Waiting for God by Simone Weil (1951)
Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil (1952)
The Ethics of Attention: Engaging the Real with Iris Murdoch and Simone Weil by Silvia Caprioglio Panizza (2022)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support. :)
Episode #174 - Simone Weil - The Mathematician
Simone Weil - The Mathematician
Key Takeaways
The Mathematician's Dilemma: Simone Weil uses a thought experiment about a mathematician punished for solving math problems with even-numbered solutions to illustrate the moral and intellectual challenges in modern society. It reflects the social costs of seeking truth over conformity, where critical thinking or ethical concerns often clash with societal or institutional norms.
Social Costs of Truth-Seeking: The episode discusses various social costs incurred in the pursuit of truth. Examples include the suppression of critical thinking in jobs for self-preservation, the education system's focus on finding correct answers over truth, and the pressures to conform to collective ideologies, such as political or religious groups.
Shift in Understanding Reality: Weil argues that a historical shift from geometric to algebraic expression in academia has led to an abstract, theoretical understanding of reality, overshadowing practical, real-world considerations. This shift impacts how social systems are understood and managed, often neglecting the real-life consequences and limitations.
Simone Weil's Call for a New Form of Attention: The episode emphasizes Weil's advocacy for a new kind of attention that seeks universality and truth over personal biases and particulars. This form of attention could lead to spiritual transformation, allowing individuals to see beyond the confines of collective thought and towards a more universal understanding of human obligations and connections.
Recommended Reading
Waiting for God by Simone Weil: A collection of letters and essays offering insights into Weil's thoughts on religious experience and the nature of God.
Gravity and Grace by Simone Weil: This book explores the dichotomy between the material and spiritual realms, delving into Weil's unique blend of philosophy and mysticism.
The Need for Roots by Simone Weil: Weil's posthumously published work that argues for the importance of spiritual and cultural roots in a healthy society.
Additional Reading List: For a more extensive reading list on Simone Weil’s work, including a suggested order for reading, visit the Instagram post at this link.
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support. :)
Episode #173 - Simone Weil - The Need For Roots
Simone Weil - The Need For Roots
This episode explores the moral and philosophical journey of Simone Weil, focusing on her belief that real understanding and ethical clarity come not from abstract theorizing, but from firsthand experience and radical empathy. Through personal anecdotes and reflections on Weil’s life—her time working in factories, her thoughts on colonialism, and her critique of human rights discourse—the episode highlights Weil’s emphasis on the “needs of the soul,” such as order, liberty, and rootedness, as essential to human flourishing. It also introduces her concept of decreation, a spiritual practice of renouncing the ego to cultivate a new kind of attention—one capable of truly seeing others in their sacred, impersonal humanity. Rather than advocating for political revolution, Weil calls for a transformation in how we perceive and respond to suffering, urging a spiritual revolution rooted in compassion, attention, and lived experience.
Recommended Reading
"Simone Weil: A Brief Introduction" by Stephen Plant (2007)
"Simone Weil (Penguin Lives)" by Francine Du Plessix Gray (2001)
"Waiting for God" by Simone Weil (1951)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #172 - Simone Weil - Attention
Simone Weil - Attention
This episode introduces Simone Weil as a rare example of a philosopher whose life embodied her ideas, emphasizing her unwavering commitment to living by the values she believed in. Beginning with her academic achievements at the École Normale Supérieure—where she outscored Simone de Beauvoir—the episode highlights key moments of Weil’s life that set her apart: her refusal to eat more than those in the French resistance, her time working in a factory to understand labor firsthand, and her participation in the Spanish Civil War. Central to her philosophy is the concept of “attention,” a practice of open, non-possessive awareness that transforms how we relate to ourselves, others, and the world. Weil believed that true education and ethical progress arise not from seeking answers but from cultivating the right orientation toward experience. The episode sets the stage for a deeper exploration of Weil’s ideas by contrasting political revolution with spiritual transformation, urging listeners to consider the profound impact of intentional attention in both personal and collective life.
Recommended Reading
The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity – Roy Porter (1997)
The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction – William Bynum (2008)
The Cambridge History of Medicine – Roy Porter (2006)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #171 - Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle
Guy Debord - The Society of the Spectacle
In this episode, the podcast explores Guy Debord’s The Society of the Spectacle, a 1967 critique of modern consumer culture that suggests we unknowingly live within a kind of economic religion—one where appearances have come to matter more than substance. Drawing on Marx’s idea of commodity fetishism and building on Feuerbach’s observations about illusion and sacredness, Debord argues that our lives are increasingly shaped by representations rather than direct experience. Through consumerism, media, and social performance, individuals are alienated not only from the production of goods, but from each other, from reality, and ultimately from themselves. The spectacle, as Debord defines it, is not just media or advertising—it is the entire system of mediated social relations that maintains the status quo by prioritizing visibility, image, and symbolic value over truth and lived experience. The episode invites listeners into a thought experiment: what if the structures we inhabit are so immersive that even realizing their influence doesn’t free us from them—but only reveals how deeply embedded we are?
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial by David Lipsky (2023)
The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells (2019)
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #170 - Albert Camus - The Fall
Albert Camus - The Fall
In this episode, Camus’s The Fall is explored as a cautionary tale for those seeking to build personal meaning in a world without intrinsic morality or divine authority. Through the confessions of the character Jean-Baptiste Clamence, Camus dissects the self-deceptions modern individuals adopt to appear virtuous while avoiding responsibility and judgment. The narrative illustrates how Clamence’s performative morality crumbles under the weight of real-life tests, exposing his hypocrisy and triggering a psychological unraveling. His eventual strategy—to become a “judge-penitent” who preemptively condemns himself in order to freely condemn others—serves as a metaphor for the duplicity and evasions common in modern society. Camus warns that crafting and living by a value system requires not just intellectual effort, but the courage to confront our own contradictions, guilt, and the inevitable judgment of others. Rather than retreat into moral theater or victimhood, Camus suggests that integrity comes from embracing these burdens honestly, even if it means living without the comforting illusion of innocence.
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial by David Lipsky (2023)
The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells (2019)
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #169 - Bruno Latour - We Have Never Been Modern
Bruno Latour - We Have Never Been Modern
In this episode, we trace the origins and development of the "ethics of care," beginning with Carol Gilligan’s challenge to Lawrence Kohlberg’s dominant theory of moral development in the 1970s. While Kohlberg’s framework privileged abstract, justice-based reasoning—exemplified by boys like Jake in the Heinz dilemma—Gilligan observed that girls like Amy approached morality relationally, emphasizing care, context, and the preservation of relationships. Her critique revealed how traditional ethical models overlooked voices shaped by caregiving roles and social interdependence. Drawing from thinkers like Virginia Held and Joan Tronto, the episode explores how care ethics redefines moral subjectivity, not as detached and rational, but as relational, emotionally attuned, and action-based. It introduces five core virtues—attentiveness, responsibility, competence, responsiveness, and plurality—as essential to developing moral maturity through care. More than a “women’s ethics,” care ethics offers a transformative alternative to justice-based frameworks, calling for a broader, more inclusive moral lens—one rooted in human connection and the maintenance of the world we live in.
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial by David Lipsky (2023)
The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming by David Wallace-Wells (2019)
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #168 - Introduction to an Ethics of Care
Introduction to an Ethics of Care
In this episode, the origins and development of the ethics of care are traced through the work of Carol Gilligan, who challenged traditional models of moral development dominated by male-centric perspectives. Reacting to Lawrence Kohlberg’s scale of moral reasoning—which favored abstract principles like justice—Gilligan argued that these models overlooked the relational and context-sensitive ways in which many women navigate ethical dilemmas. Through her analysis of the Heinz dilemma and the differing responses of Jake and Amy, Gilligan introduced a new moral lens centered on empathy, interdependence, and care. This perspective critiques the notion of the autonomous, rational moral subject and instead emphasizes attentiveness, responsibility, competence, responsiveness, and plurality as foundational virtues. By elevating care from the private to the public sphere, Gilligan and philosophers like Virginia Held and Joan Tronto assert that caring is not just a feminine trait or domestic concern—it’s a vital moral framework with the potential to reshape society’s ethical priorities on a systemic level.
Further Reading:
The Parrot and the Igloo: Climate and the Science of Denial by David Lipsky (2023)
The Organized Mind: Thinking Straight in the Age of Information Overload by Daniel J. Levitin (2014)
Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain by David Eagleman (2011)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #167 - Jose Ortega - Revolt of the Masses
Jose Ortega - Revolt of the Masses
In this episode, the discussion builds on José Ortega y Gasset’s warning about the rise of the “mass man”—a psychological type marked by self-satisfaction, cultural disengagement, and a lack of historical awareness. Ortega argues that in modern democracies, the mass mentality, born into unprecedented freedom, often rejects the responsibility that comes with it, flattening out qualitative distinctions between perspectives, experiences, and expertise. This has led to a culture where all opinions are treated as equally valid, even when they lack depth or effort. Ortega traces this shift to the rise of hyper-democracy, mass culture, and a rejection of historical consciousness, which he sees as essential to understanding oneself and the human condition. He contrasts this with a self-imposed aristocracy—not of wealth or status, but of character and intellectual effort—defined by the pursuit of self-refinement, historical understanding, and moral obligation. For Ortega, preserving equality requires recognizing and honoring those who strive for excellence, rather than celebrating mediocrity.
Further Reading:
The Revolt of the Masses by José Ortega y Gasset (1930)
The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind by Gustave Le Bon (1895)
The Revolt of the Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium by Martin Gurri (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #166 - Jose Ortega - Circumstance
Jose Ortega - Circumstance
In this episode, we explore the philosophy of José Ortega y Gasset, a thinker who resisted narrow labels like existentialist or phenomenologist, and instead pursued a broader vision: rehumanizing our understanding of reality. Ortega challenges traditional dualisms—especially Descartes’ mind-body split—and instead argues that human existence is inseparable from the circumstances it inhabits. His famous phrase, “I am I and my circumstance,” encapsulates this view: we are not isolated minds navigating the world, but unified beings shaped by, and responsible for, the historical, social, and physical conditions we inherit. Ortega’s perspectivism acknowledges the limits of human understanding while rejecting the idea that all perspectives are equally valid. Instead, he calls for active engagement with our circumstances—seeking truth through a multiplicity of viewpoints and continuous reexamination. For Ortega, philosophy is not a passive discipline, but a form of “theoretical heroism,” demanding both humility and courage as we forge meaning in a world of uncertainty.
Further Reading:
The Revolt of the Masses – José Ortega y Gasset (1994)
What Is Philosophy? – José Ortega y Gasset (1964)
Meditations on Quixote – José Ortega y Gasset (1963)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #165 - Ralph Waldo Emerson - Nature and Other Things
Ralph Waldo Emerson - Nature and Other Things
This episode explores Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay Nature, framing it as a response to humanity’s long-standing disunity and overreliance on inherited narratives. Emerson argues that true insight and moral clarity begin not through books or societal structures, but through a personal, intuitive relationship with Nature—defined broadly as everything outside the self. The episode outlines how most people project learned abstractions onto their experience of nature, preventing them from perceiving it freshly and honestly. By shedding these inherited filters and approaching nature with childlike attention, individuals can access a deeper unity that connects all life. Nature is portrayed as a provider, healer, teacher, and even a moral guide—offering not just material support but spiritual truths. Emerson warns, however, that science alone cannot reveal this wisdom; nor can endless study without action. Ultimately, the episode presents Emerson’s belief that creating new ideas, grounded in individual experience and intuitive understanding, is essential for personal growth and societal progress.
Further Reading:
Nature and Selected Essays by Ralph Waldo Emerson, edited by Larzer Ziff (2003)
Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson, illustrated by Jessica Helfand (2021)
The Philosophy of Ralph Waldo Emerson by Joseph Urbas (2020)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)