Episode #157 - The Creation of Meaning - Simone De Beauvoir
The Creation of Meaning - Simone De Beauvoir
This episode explores the tension between meaninglessness and meaning-making, drawing on the ideas of Emil Cioran and Simone de Beauvoir. While Cioran confronts the absence of objective meaning with a philosophy of intellectual honesty and absurdity, de Beauvoir challenges both escapist optimism and nihilistic surrender by framing meaning as something created within the ambiguity of existence. The episode examines how existential discomfort drives both personal creativity and philosophical systems, often leading thinkers to overemphasize one side of a binary—subject or object, individual or group, freedom or limitation—at the expense of the other. De Beauvoir argues for embracing this ambiguity as the only honest ground for creating values, urging individuals to take responsibility not only for their own subjectivity but also for the freedom of others. Through this lens, the creation of meaning becomes a continuous, uncertain, but essential task of ethical existence.
Further Reading:
The Trouble with Being Born by E.M. Cioran (2013)
The Ethics of Ambiguity by Simone de Beauvoir (2018)
Start Making Sense: How Existential Psychology Can Help Us Build a Life That Matters by Jonathan Haidt (2025)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #156 - Emil Cioran pt. 2 - Failure and Suicide
Emil Cioran pt. 2
This episode continues the exploration of Emil Cioran’s thought, focusing on his relationship to writing, failure, and suicide—not as abstract concepts, but as lived experiences. Cioran wrote not to convince or instruct, but to endure, using writing as a deeply personal form of therapy that gave shape to the chaos of life. His fragmentary style reflects this intent, resisting traditional structure in favor of emotional honesty. Central to the discussion is Cioran’s view of failure—not as something to avoid, but as a profound and revealing force. He saw failure as more honest than success, a reflection of who we truly are, and a constant companion that shapes the way we live and make decisions. The episode also examines Cioran’s treatment of suicide, not as a call to action but as a conceptual freedom that made life more bearable. In both themes, Cioran encourages us to stop running from what makes us uncomfortable and instead face it directly, suggesting that only by doing so can we begin to understand what it means to be human in an absurd world.
Further Reading:
On the Heights of Despair by E. M. Cioran (1996)
The Trouble with Being Born by E. M. Cioran (2013)
Tears and Saints by E. M. Cioran (1998)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #155 - Emil Cioran Pt. 1 - Absurdity and Nothingness
Episode 155 - Emil Cioran Pt. 1 - Absurdity and Nothingness
Emil Cioran’s work confronts the unsettling realities of human existence, focusing on suffering, absurdity, and the emotional weight of being conscious in a seemingly indifferent world. Rejecting traditional philosophy, religious consolation, and rational systems, he presents life as a series of unresolved contradictions rather than a problem to be solved. His writing style—fragmented and aphoristic—reflects a belief that attempts to explain away despair only distance us from the truth of lived experience. Rather than deny or distract from feelings like dread, melancholy, or failure, Cioran sees value in acknowledging them as universal parts of being human. His reflections suggest that meaning cannot be imposed or reasoned into existence, and that by facing the discomfort of existence directly, people may find a quiet kind of connection—not through answers, but through shared recognition of life’s underlying absurdity.
Further Reading:
On the Heights of Despair by E. M. Cioran (1996)
The Trouble with Being Born by E. M. Cioran (2013)
Tears and Saints by E. M. Cioran (1998)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #154 - Pragmatism and Truth
Pragmatism and Truth
This episode introduces the core ideas of pragmatism by tracing how philosophers like Charles Sanders Peirce and William James responded to the crisis of certainty in modern thought. As traditional paths to truth—such as solipsism, foundationalism, and the correspondence theory—began to break down, pragmatists proposed a new way forward: defining truth not as a fixed essence or correspondence to reality, but as a process grounded in human action and communal inquiry. Truth, for the pragmatists, is what proves itself useful over time—what people collectively converge on through experience and experimentation. The episode also explores James’s view of free will and how personal temperament shapes our relationship with truth and meaning. Through the lens of healthy-mindedness and sick-souled awareness, James presents a pluralistic understanding of religious experience and emphasizes the power of belief in shaping our reality—arguing that in a world without certainty, our actions and intentions help bring truth into being.
Further Reading:
Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking by William James (1907)
Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism by Charles Sanders Peirce (1997)
The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America by Louis Menand (2001)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #153 - The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin Pt. 2 - Distraction
Episode 153 - The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin Pt. 2 - Distraction
This episode continues the exploration of Walter Benjamin’s ideas by examining how technological advancements transform human perception, storytelling, and political life. It traces the historical shift from oral traditions—communal, variable, and reflective—to the solitary focus of the novel, and eventually to the mass-reproducible, fast-paced distractions of film and video. Benjamin’s analysis highlights how modern media changes not only the form of art but also how people engage with it: moving from deep concentration to habitual distraction. These new sensory and technological conditions shape collective subjectivity, reinforcing dominant ideologies while diminishing the capacity for critical reflection. The episode connects these ideas to the rise of fascism, the commodification of art, and the erosion of meaningful communication, ultimately suggesting that as media mediates more of our lives, the ability to share authentic experience becomes increasingly difficult.
Further Reading:
The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media — Walter Benjamin (2008)
Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings — Walter Benjamin (1978)
Walter Benjamin: A Critical Life — Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings (2014)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #152 - The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin Pt. 1
Episode 152 - The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin Pt. 1
Walter Benjamin’s early work explores how modern technology has profoundly altered the way people experience art, identity, and reality. Beginning with his essay The Task of the Translator, Benjamin argues that translation is not merely about making a text accessible, but about preserving the deeper, almost spiritual essence of the original—a task bound up with the nature of art itself. He emphasizes that true art exists independently of its audience and retains a unique “aura” rooted in time, place, and presence. But this aura is threatened by technologies like photography, which make images infinitely reproducible while stripping them of their uniqueness. Benjamin traces this loss through the shift from painting to photography and ultimately to mass media, where everything—including people—can be commodified and endlessly copied. The result, he warns, is a cultural moment where individuality and aesthetic depth are flattened, and old methods of critique no longer suffice. His work sets the stage for a new way of understanding how technological reproduction reshapes not just art, but human perception and selfhood.
Further Reading:
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by Walter Benjamin (1936)
Walter Benjamin and the Work of Art by Andrew E. Benjamin (2005)
The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media by Walter Benjamin (2008)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #151 - The Frankfurt School - Erich Fromm on Freedom
Erich Fromm on Freedom
This episode continues the exploration of Erich Fromm’s work by turning to his 1941 book Escape from Freedom, where he investigates a troubling paradox of modern life: after centuries of fighting for individual autonomy, many people now feel more isolated and anxious than ever. Drawing a parallel between personal development and human history, Fromm likens the journey from ancient unity with nature to modern individuality to the growth of a child into adulthood—gaining freedom, but also the burden of self-responsibility. The episode explores how this “individuation” has created unprecedented negative freedom (freedom from external constraints), but without a corresponding sense of positive freedom—spontaneous, self-directed connection to the world—people may retreat into authoritarianism, destructiveness, or blind conformity. These escape strategies, though offering security, ultimately sacrifice individuality. Through historical context and psychological insight, the episode highlights Fromm’s core concern: that unless we learn how to embrace freedom meaningfully, we risk surrendering it entirely.
Further Reading:
Conformity: The Power of Social Influences by Cass R. Sunstein (2019)
Freedom Beyond Sovereignty: Reconstructing Liberal Individualism by Sharon R. Krause (2015)
The Dynamic Individualism of William James by James O. Pawelski (2007)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #150 - The Frankfurt School - Erich Fromm on Love
Erich Fromm on Love
In this episode, the discussion centers on Erich Fromm’s view of love as explored in The Art of Loving. Fromm argues that the fundamental human problem is a sense of existential separateness, and that love—understood not as a fleeting emotion but as an active faculty—is the only meaningful answer to this condition. The episode critiques how modern capitalist society encourages transactional relationships, where people treat themselves and others as commodities to be consumed. Fromm challenges this model by redefining love as an art—one that requires humility, courage, faith, and discipline to master. Rather than something that happens passively, real love is portrayed as an intentional act of giving that fosters growth, freedom, and connection, rooted in one’s capacity to love both others and oneself.
Further Reading:
The Art of Loving – Erich Fromm (1956)
Love and Will – Rollo May (1969)
All About Love – bell hooks (2000)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #149 - On Media Pt. 2 - Marshall McLuhan
Marshall McLuhan
This episode introduces the media theory of Marshall McLuhan, who argued that technologies and mediums are not just tools we use, but extensions of ourselves that shape how we perceive the world and understand what it means to be human. Drawing from McLuhan’s favorite metaphor—Poe’s “Descent into the Maelström”—the discussion frames modern life as a kind of vortex in which people must study the patterns around them to navigate change. McLuhan viewed media not in terms of content, but in terms of their broader cultural effects—how they alter the scale, pace, and patterns of human experience. The shift from oral to literate societies, and now to an electric, interconnected world, dramatically changes how we communicate, think, and live. He famously argued that “the medium is the message,” emphasizing that the form of media impacts us more profoundly than the information it carries. As society moves toward what he called a “global village,” McLuhan’s work challenges us to remain conscious of the hidden forces shaping our lives.
Further Reading:
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man – Marshall McLuhan (1964)
The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects – Marshall McLuhan and Quentin Fiore (1967)
The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century – Marshall McLuhan and Bruce R. Powers (1989)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #148 - On Media Pt. 1 - Manufacturing Consent
Manufacturing Consent
This episode explores how modern media functions not simply as a source of information, but as a powerful intermediary that filters and shapes public perception. Drawing on the work of Noam Chomsky, Edward Herman, and Walter Lippmann, it presents the idea that media operates less like a truth-telling institution and more like a system designed to maintain existing power structures. The discussion centers on the concept of media as a “medium”—an environment that influences how impressions are formed—raising questions about who controls this environment and why. Through historical examples like wartime propaganda and anti-labor strategies, the episode outlines how media has been used to manufacture public consent by limiting the boundaries of acceptable discourse. Chomsky and Herman’s five filters—ownership, advertising, sourcing, flack, and fear—are introduced as the mechanisms that guide what stories are told and how they’re framed. Ultimately, the episode encourages a reevaluation of how beliefs are shaped in a media-saturated world.
Further Reading:
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky (1988)
Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda by Noam Chomsky (2002)
Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann (1922)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #147 - Being and Becoming
Being and Becoming
The episode explores the debate between being and becoming, showing how philosophers like Heraclitus, Nietzsche, and Whitehead challenge fixed ideas of identity by emphasizing change and process. It critiques reductionist science and language, arguing for a view of reality as dynamic, interconnected, and always evolving.
Further Reading:
Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues by Nicholas Rescher (2000)
Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead by C. Robert Mesle (2008)
Process and Reality by Alfred North Whitehead (1929)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #146 - Bergson on Laughter Pt. 2 - Vitalism
Henri Bergson on laughter
This is part two of the show’s deep dive into Henri Bergson’s Laughter. The episode connects Bergson’s hybrid theory of comedy to his broader philosophical worldview shaped by process philosophy and vitalism. Drawing from Heraclitus, Bergson sees life as a constant, flowing process that resists static, mechanistic explanations. He argues that laughter arises when something rigid or mechanical disrupts the natural fluidity of life—a phenomenon he famously describes as “the mechanical encrusted upon the living.” For Bergson, laughter isn’t just about amusement; it serves a social function. It acts as a subtle corrective, encouraging people to remain adaptable and in tune with the vitality of society. Through this lens, we laugh not only at the absurd or the powerful but at anything that signals a lack of flexibility—whether it’s a distracted friend or a blind conformist. While Bergson's theory aligns with earlier ideas like superiority and incongruity, it ultimately frames laughter as both an intuitive reaction and a social message, balancing critique and absurdity with an underlying impulse toward collective health.
Further Reading:
Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic by Henri Bergson (1900)
Living in Time: The Philosophy of Henri Bergson by Barry Allen (2023)
Bergson's Philosophy of Biology: Virtuality, Tendency and Time by Tano S. Posteraro (2022)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #145 - Henri Bergson Pt. 1 - History
Henri Bergson
In this episode, the show explores Henri Bergson’s essay Laughter, focusing on the philosophical roots of why humans laugh and what laughter reveals about society. It begins by questioning whether laughter truly reflects happiness and moves into a discussion of historical theories—like superiority, relief, and incongruity—each offering different explanations for humor. Bergson challenges these traditional views by suggesting that laughter arises when something mechanical disrupts the natural fluidity of human behavior, arguing that the comic is deeply tied to social life and human experience. He blends elements from past theories into a broader, more dynamic perspective, suggesting that laughter isn’t just emotional release or superiority—it’s also a subtle tool we use to regulate cultural norms and challenge rigidity in ourselves and others. The episode sets up a deeper dive into Bergson’s ideas in part two, teasing future connections to time, process philosophy, and the nature of change.
Further Reading:
Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic – Henri Bergson (1900)
The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor – John Morreall (1987)
Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor – John Morreall (2009)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #144 - Max Weber - Iron Cage
Max Weber
On this episode, we begin our discussion on the work of Max Weber.
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #143 - Jürgen Habermas - The Public Sphere
Episode 143 - Jürgen Habermas - The Public Sphere
This episode dives into the philosophy of Jürgen Habermas and his mission to rethink the Enlightenment in a way that still makes sense today. A lot of past thinkers criticized the Enlightenment for putting too much faith in reason, which they believed led to big problems like war and oppression. But Habermas didn’t want to throw the whole thing out. Instead, he believed the real issue wasn’t reason itself—it was how we’ve been using it. He introduced the idea of “communicative rationality,” where reason isn’t about cold logic or manipulating people, but about real, honest conversations where people listen, share, and try to understand one another. To him, this kind of communication is the heart of democracy and the way we should make decisions as a society. He also talks about how we've lost a lot of these meaningful conversations over time—replaced by media and systems more focused on control than connection. Habermas believes that the power to change things still lives in us, if we’re willing to engage with each other sincerely and rebuild those public spaces where everyone’s voice can matter.
Further Reading:
The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society by Jürgen Habermas (1984)
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society by Jürgen Habermas (1989)
Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment edited by Axel Honneth, Thomas McCarthy, Claus Offe, and Albrecht Wellmer (1992)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #142 - Richard Rorty
Richard Rorty
In this episode, the show explores the political philosophy of Richard Rorty, focusing on his rejection of universal, ahistorical foundations for ideas like human rights and liberal democracy. Rather than grounding these values in divine will or rational truths, Rorty sees them as contingent products of specific historical and cultural contexts. He argues that reason is not a tool for uncovering objective reality, but a human practice shaped by language and culture—a means of fostering solidarity rather than accessing eternal truths. Embracing the legacy of the Enlightenment as a call to question authority rather than to establish it, Rorty champions a pragmatic, pluralistic approach to politics. He encourages living as an “ironist”—someone who is critically aware of the limits of their own worldview and remains open to new vocabularies and perspectives. Ultimately, the episode highlights Rorty’s belief that legitimacy in political life comes not from philosophical absolutes, but from the shared values and decisions of people living together in particular times and places.
Further Reading:
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity by Richard Rorty (1989)
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature by Richard Rorty (1979)
Richard Rorty: Politics and Vision by Christopher J. Voparil (2006)
See the full transcript here
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #141 - Isaiah Berlin pt. 2 - Pluralism and Culture
Isaiah Berlin pt. 2 - Pluralism and Culture
This episode continues the discussion of Isaiah Berlin’s political philosophy, focusing on his rejection of monism—the idea that all moral and political questions have one correct answer. Berlin argues that human values often conflict in ways that can’t be solved by a single system or rule, using examples like mercy versus justice or freedom versus equality to show how these tensions play out in real life. He calls this view pluralism, the belief that different, even opposing values can be equally valid and rational. Pluralism, for Berlin, is not the same as relativism; while cultures may differ, people still share basic human goals like safety, freedom, and meaning. He believes that rationality can’t solve every disagreement, but it can help us understand each other and promote tolerance. In place of rigid systems, Berlin proposes liberal pluralism—an approach that accepts moral complexity and encourages empathy across political and cultural divides.
Further Reading:
The Crooked Timber of Humanity by Isaiah Berlin (1990)
Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism by George Crowder (2004)
Isaiah Berlin: An Interpretation of His Thought by John Gray (1996)
See the full transcript here
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #140 - Isaiah Berlin pt. 1 - Pluralism
Isaiah Berlin Part 1 - Pluralism
This episode explores the political philosophy of Isaiah Berlin, highlighting his attempt to bridge the gap between Enlightenment universalism and modern relativism. Berlin critiques the Enlightenment’s belief in a single, rational moral truth—what he calls “monism”—and instead defends value pluralism, the idea that multiple, conflicting, yet reasonable values can coexist.
At the heart of the episode is Berlin’s famous distinction between negative and positive liberty: freedom from outside interference versus freedom to realize one’s true self. While negative liberty protects individuals from coercion, Berlin warns that positive liberty—especially as used by thinkers like Rousseau—can justify authoritarian control under the claim of enforcing “true freedom.”
The episode also touches on Berlin’s admiration for Counter-Enlightenment thinkers, who rejected universal ideals in favor of culture, community, and historical context. Ultimately, Berlin’s pluralist approach offers a way to navigate political life without forcing all people into a single moral framework.
Further Reading:
Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty – Isaiah Berlin (2002)
Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism – George Crowder (2004)
Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom: 'Two Concepts of Liberty' 50 Years Later – Bruce Baum & Robert Nichols, eds. (2013)
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #139 - Friedrich Von Hayek - The Road to Serfdom
Friedrich Von Hayek
On this episode, we begin our discussion on the work of Henri Bergson.
See the full transcript here.
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)
Episode #138 - Robert Nozick - The Minimal State
Robert Nozick - The Minimal State
This episode explores Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia, a foundational libertarian response to the political challenges of the 20th century. Positioned between anarchism and the expansive welfare liberalism of thinkers like John Rawls, Nozick argues for a “minimal state” limited to protecting individual rights and enforcing contracts—nothing more. The episode contrasts Nozick’s views with Rawls’s emphasis on fairness and redistributive justice, highlighting Nozick’s belief that justice is not about what people deserve, but about what they are entitled to through lawful acquisition. Through accessible examples and thought experiments, the episode explains Nozick’s critique of forced taxation, patterned distributions, and centralized government planning. Instead, Nozick champions a framework where individuals retain self-ownership, rights are treated as inviolable moral constraints, and society functions as a space for voluntary, diverse experiments in living.
Further Reading:
Anarchy, State, and Utopia by Robert Nozick (1974)
A Theory of Justice by John Rawls (1971)
Libertarianism: A Primer by David Boaz (1997)
See the full transcript here
Thank you to everyone who makes this podcast a possibility in the future.
I could never do this without your support! :)